|
|
Air Support.
Navigation: Main page
Author: Donnelly, Sally B.
Section: BUSINESS
Should the U.S. keep bailing out airlines? Here's a post-9/11 success story--plus a cautionary tale
Remember the airline
bailouts following 9/11? Less than a month after the 2001 attacks,
Congress rushed through a $15 billion bounty of subsidies and loan
guarantees for U.S. carriers--which suffered catastrophic human and
business losses that day and the next two. Washington first forked over
money for anything that could be linked to 9/11, then paid out $1.5
billion in assistance to five airlines that claimed to be on the verge
of extinction.
Since then, the
bailout program has been widely criticized as wasteful, in part because
it was clear prior to 9/11 that the airline industry had too much
capacity and some carriers were in trouble. In this
capitalism-without-a-parachute view, the demise of a carrier or two was
inevitable and the attacks, however brutal, served to accelerate that
process.
But the full story of
the bailouts is more complicated--and more interesting. To judge their
effectiveness, it helps to look at two airlines that received
assistance and whose fortunes have dramatically diverged since those
frantic days. America West, which was among the nation's most inept
airlines, has used its $380 million in federal loans to transform
itself into an innovative industry leader. Another inefficient carrier,
US Airways, got nearly $1 billion--the government's largest aid
package--and stayed inefficient. US Airways is in such poor shape that
some analysts expect another bankruptcy. With the government's
big-airlines record at 1-1, the issue of federal assistance is looming
again. Bankrupt United Airlines will, for the second time, soon ask
Washington for an aid package, this one totaling $1.8 billion.
America West makes a
compelling case for fedfare. Just a few years ago, the airline was so
awful that some flyers called it "America Worst." For much of its
20-year history, the airline, based in Phoenix, Ariz., had been hurt by
maintenance and operational problems, inconsistent leadership and its
location in the sleepy southwestern U.S.
The new management
team led by current CEO Doug Parker, 41, was in the process of
transforming the airline when 9/11 hit. Parker was first to ask
for--and receive--a government loan guarantee from the Air
Transportation Stabilization Board (ATSB), which had $10 billion to
dole out in such guarantees. Barely three months after the attacks,
America West was handed a $379.6 million loan-guarantee package. In
return, the government demanded severe limits on labor costs and took
19 million stock warrants giving it the right to buy shares at $3.
The airline used some
of the money to accelerate the transformation it had already begun. Hal
Heule, an industry veteran who began as an apprentice engineer at Pan
Am in 1967, had been hired in 2000 to orchestrate the turnaround. Over
eight months the airline added 40% more mechanics (to reach a total of
779), fired underperforming vendors and brought vital maintenance work
back in-house.
The changes made a
stunning difference. There has been a 100% improvement in the number of
planes available for service each day. The cancellation rate has
dropped dramatically. The airline now cancels only about one flight a
day for maintenance reasons--compared with more than 30 flights a day
in the summer of 2000. America West is among the best of the majors in
on-time performance, customer satisfaction and baggage handling. Says
Heule: "We couldn't have gotten aid from the ATSB without first proving
that we'd turned operations around. And we wouldn't be here without
that loan."
The transformation in
operations had to be accompanied by one in service. In short, says
Scott Kirby, 36, the company's intense marketing maven, "airlines had
to stop screwing the customer." So in March 2002, America West shocked
the industry by radically revamping its business model--no more
required Saturday-night stays and no more exorbitant last-minute prices.
The moves are paying
off. Leisure passengers have been the carrier's bread and butter, but
business passengers--who tend to pay higher fares--today account for
44% of revenue, up from 34% last year. A simplified upgrade
policy--which lets anyone, on any fare, move up to first class for as
little as $50 if a seat is available--has raked in $35 million in extra
sales. Next month the hub-and-spoke airline is starting nonstop flights
for $299 on routes like New York City to San Francisco.
Wall Street is on
board too. America West is one of the hottest stocks on the N.Y.S.E.,
up 549% this year alone. The carrier earned $32.9 million in the third
quarter of 2003, compared with a $49.6 million loss for the same period
last year.
US Airways, on the
other hand, received more than any other carrier but has not done
enough with it. "The ATSB knew there was a fundamental question of
whether US Airways was even viable, given its high labor costs and weak
route structure," says a former government official familiar with the
board's thinking. Still, the ATSB cut the check and hoped for the best.
US Airways had a
tougher climb than America West. For two decades, beset by demanding
unions and weak management, the airline has had the highest labor costs
in the business. From 1985 through 2003, US Airways' labor costs have
averaged nearly 40% of revenues, compared with 31% at other airlines,
according to AirlineForecasts, an investment research firm.
It's not for lack of
effort. US Airways has cut 18,198 of 46,579 jobs, replaced big,
expensive planes with smaller jets, and jettisoned its pilots' pension
program. Still, the airline lost money for two consecutive quarters
this year, dropping $90 million in the third quarter alone. Like a
damaged World War II bomber, US Airways is big, slow and vulnerable.
And the fighter jets are closing in. Southwest is going to attack the
Philadelphia "fortress" hub of US Airways, where it accounts for 65% of
the flights and where it has kept out rivals by scheduling more flights
of its own. "Southwest in Philadelphia may prove to be the straw that
breaks US Airways' back," says Vaughn Cordle, CEO of AirlineForecasts.
If the ATSB helps
United Airlines, a bankrupt legacy airline that in some ways is a big
version of US Airways, the argument may get political. There are 62,174
jobs on the line, not to mention a lot of potential votes. United has
spent the past year lining up political supporters around Washington,
including Congressman Dennis Hastert, the House Speaker.
Surprisingly,
United's decision to return to the federal trough is drawing flak
within the industry. In a rare display of intra-airline bickering, Leo
Mullin, the head of Delta Airlines and the industry's key lobbyist for
government assistance since 9/11, said, "The ATSB should be limited to
overseeing the outstanding loans. Then it should go out of business."
Added Mullin, whose carrier did not apply to the ATSB for money: "Let
the marketplace work." That's easy for him to say, since Delta will
probably survive. Some other airlines flying today will not.
After 9/11, a few airlines got loan guarantees. Here are the five biggest beneficiaries
US Airways $900 million
America West $380 million
ATA Airlines $149 million
Frontier Airlines $63 million
Aloha Airlines $40 million
America West has used its subsidies and loan guarantees wisely, unlike its troubled rival
Annual cost per employee: $89,278
Employees per aircraft: 94
Labor cost as a % of revenue: 38%
Annual cost per employee: $56,062
Employees per aircraft: 79
Labor cost as a % of revenue: 26%
Source: AirlineForecasts
PHOTO (COLOR): HIGHFLYER: Under Parker, America West is no longer "America Worst"
PHOTO (COLOR)
PHOTO (COLOR)
~~~~~~~~ By Sally B. Donnelly, Phoenix
Some items on this website are used by permission granted
in the Fair Use guidelines of the 1976 U.S. Copyright Act.
info [at] singlearticles.com
Powered by CommonSense
|
|
|
|