|
|
Meet the New Black: Contextual Advertising.
Navigation: Main page
Author: Mack, Ann M.
Section: Qi interactive News
| Meet the New Black: Contextual Advertising |
Program makers Google and Overture vie for a burgeoning biz
Dateline: NEW YORK
A month ago today,
the team responsible for Google's AdSense played darts and snacked on
popcorn at a small outdoor barbecue to celebrate the one-year
anniversary of the contextual advertising program. The dunking tank was
nixed, said Google director of content media Kurt Abrahamson, joking,
"I would have been the target."
What launched as a
program for publishers with 20-million-plus page views a month, like
Knight Ridder and HowStuffWorks, has grown to include "thousands" of
sites, thanks to Google opening it up to smaller players last June.
"We've seen a steady increase. We have thousands of publishers, and
that number continues to grow," said Abrahamson. "It is a nice
additional stream of revenue that doesn't cannibalize a Web publisher's
sales efforts."
And where Google is,
its main rival in search marketing is sure to be. Last June,
Yahoo!-owned Overture launched its own contextual-advertising product,
Content Match.
Since then, the two
companies have been competing for contextual ad contracts with large
publishers. Just last week, GNN.com, ESPN.com and WSJ.com struck deals
with Overture for its product. Some recent signings for Mountain View,
Calif.-based Google include CNet and CareerBuilder. Publishers admit
that when they consider one, they inevitably review the other.
Hoping to bask in the
afterglow of search advertising's glorious ascent, legions of Web
publishers have been adopting these relevant text-based ads that appear
in shaded boxes alongside, below or within their editorial content.
Large Web publishers
use words like "significant" and "material" to describe how much
revenue they expect to reap from this ad format, which, in most cases,
supplements their display and classified advertising income. "It has
the potential to be a powerful revenue driver for us," said Riley
McDonough, vp of sales at ESPN.com.
"Basically, these
publishers love contextual ads because they deliver more revenue per
page than run-of-site banner ads. These are pages historically that
have been difficult to monetize well â€" general news pages, sports
pages, entertainment news," said Charlene Li, principal analyst at
Forrester Research.
The Boston-based
research firm estimates that contextual listing spending will rise from
$48 million in 2003 to $578 million in 2008, or roughly 10 percent of
total search marketing spend.
"It provides more
opportunities to advertisers to participate with our audience and
therefore, it's an incremental revenue stream," said Adriann Bouten, vp
of technology and business development at USAToday.com, which has used
Google's AdSense product for over a year.
David Payne, svp and
general manager at CNN.com, which will start showing Overture's Content
Match ads within the next six weeks, observed, "In effect, all of our
pages are presold on a base of a couple hundred thousand advertisers.
So, we don't have to worry about unsold inventory because potentially
every page of our site will have a match with a keyword that's been
bidded on by advertisers."
Calling contextual
advertising "the Web's response to product placement," G2 principal
analyst Denise Garcia said, "It's somewhat blurring the line between
advertising and content. ... It seems to be that the market in general
is looking toward new ways of placing [ads] online and offline, and
this is the online response to that."
In addition to
Overture and Google, other companies such as Kanoodle, Industry Brains
and Vibrant Media offer versions of contextual ad programs. Vibrant
Media's IntelliTXT technology, for instance, double-underlines keywords
that advertisers have bid on within editorial news stories; when a user
mouses over the highlighted word, a small ad pops up.
Contextual
advertising, or the idea of placing ads relevant to content, has
existed for ages. How it's done on the Web, however, is new. Both
Overture and Google use an algorithmic engine to process the text on
Web pages and match it to keywords that advertisers in their database
have bid on.
No matter how
intelligent the technology, though, mistakes happen, some of which
undoubtedly will become a thing of urban legend. By now, everyone in
the online ad realm has heard the one about a Samsonite ad appearing
next to a story about body parts being found in a suitcase.
USAToday.com's Bouten cited a more recent example: An ad for steroids
was served in response to a news story of steroid abuse.
How did the online
newspaper deal with it? The ad was removed "swiftly and quickly,"
Bouten said. "It's not a mistake that was made by either party because
you can't anticipate those types of situations. We have a good process
to be able to deal with it as it happens," he said, recalling only
three incidents in the last year. "I can't sit here and promise that it
will never happen again because of the open nature of the sponsored
links advertising."
It's an imperfect
science, but it's improving. Google, for instance, has a team of
linguists who use their understanding of words and word grouping to
fine-tune the technology, so it doesn't serve ads in inappropriate
places.
Overture pairs its
technology with a staff of 100 editors, who control the process on some
pages that call for more attention, such as section fronts. "There is a
sweet spot between marrying both the editorial team and the engineering
talent that we have to build the best product," said Paul Volen, vp of
product partner marketing at Pasadena, Calif.-based Overture. "As we
rolled this product out, we started hearing from publishers: 'Hey, we
think dynamic works on some pages and some content. But we also like
the safety, comfort and control of knowing there's an editorial team
choosing the appropriate keywords and listings on some select content.'"
The honing continues.
Two weeks ago, Google said it plans to reduce the cost a marketer pays
for clicks on a page in its content network if data finds that a click
is less likely to generate business results. For instance, a click on
an ad for digital cameras on a Web page about photography tips may be
worth less than a click on the same ad appearing next to a review for
digital cameras.
At the end of the
day, publishers, providers, advertisers and agencies alike agree that
context is king. "As long as the advertising is relevant to those
articles and to the editorial, it will work. It's really the
responsibility of both the advertisers and publishers to make sure they
continue to make those ads relevant," said James Kiernan, associate
media director at Interpublic Group's FCBi, which develops contextual
ad opportunities for clients such as Hewlett-Packard and Qwest.
"At the point the
opportunity starts to get exploited ... that's where you're going to
get user skepticism and reluctance to click on those links," he said.
~~~~~~~~ By Ann M. Mack
Some items on this website are used by permission granted
in the Fair Use guidelines of the 1976 U.S. Copyright Act.
info [at] singlearticles.com
Powered by CommonSense
|
|
information technology. The article offers news briefs concerning information technology. Accenture has been awarded a 10-ye...
FOREVER YOUR GIRL? Discusses how Paula Abdul, 41-year-old 'American Idol' judge, recruited the L.A.-based matchmaking s...
Selling Your Home in Trickier Times. This article presents suggestions for home owners in selling their residential property in a tough h...
|
|