Single Articles - the ultimate article blog

Titles Titles & descriptions

  

Offline domination still a world away for Google.

Navigation: Main page

Author: Oser, Kris

Section: Interactive
Offline domination still a world away for Google


Auction-based print, radio services are a draw for small advertisers, but have yet to develop mass

GOOGLE'S INTRODUCTION of an auction-based print-ad service and an automated radio-ad-buying company left many buyers and sellers fretting that the search giant could dominate offline media the way it holds sway online.

But if that happens, it will be years away.

For one, not only are Google Print and radio-ad-buyer dMarc still new and largely untested, they are currently considered remnant services that don't meet the needs of large mainstream marketers, and buyers said it will be years before Google is equipped to offer one-stop-shopping across all media. "You are not going to find big advertisers going after" the new Google services, said George Janson, managing partner and director of print, Mediaedge:cia. "They are going after the low-hanging fruit."

Nor does Google now have the offline mass, efficiencies or expertise in buying to disrupt traditional media agencies-yet. "What Google is trying to do is become a one-stop media shop," said Shar VananBoskirk, analyst, specializing in interactive area, Forrester Research. "The skills that a good media buyer has are still necessary. But the way that marketers buy will change-on a CPM, a cost-per-action or on a bid basis, and a media agency will have to accommodate all those possibilities."

PRIMING

For now, Google is off to a shaky start. DMarc isn't yet up and running as a Google unit, and Google Print is still in a testing phase. "Google doesn't know anything about the radio business," said Kathy Crawford, president of local broadcast for MindShare.

Google Print and dMarc are essentially remnant-ad services, attractive to small companies looking for last-minute deals, although dMarc has told media agencies that it is going to hold out a quantity of inventory to be used for upfront or long-term media planning purposes. "I don't think it's aimed at large advertisers," said Safa Rashtchy, managing director, Piper Jaffrey. "That is the goal eventually. To begin with, they have to prime it with small advertisers."

Tim Armstrong, Google's VP-advertising sales and operations, has told Advertising Age that "The walls between offline and online budgets are starting to come down quickly.…We are always considering ways to extend ad programming." And the promise behind that multi-channel ad programming is increased efficiency.

Patrick Keane, Google's head of sales strategy, said the main benefit is "deeper metrics." Auction-based print and radio "are really the research and development for advertising publishers and agencies," he said. "It's a deeper set of metrics for accountability and performance for how their ads work."

DMarc "would allow you to buy and sell inventory on an automated basis," said Matt Feinberg, senior VP-radio and interactive broadcast extensions at Zenith Media, and provide a giant step toward accountability. "You would buy a spot on a station and be able to tell within a close time frame if your spot ran and where exactly it ran," he said.

But for big brands to call on Google to place print, radio or even TV ads, it needs essentially what it has online: mass. The company would need to migrate a lot of its online advertisers to offline as well. Google is thought to have about 400,000 advertisers, and it revealed at an analyst conference last month that they include 88 of Advertising Age's 100 Leading National Advertisers as search customers. Mr. Rashtchy estimated that the engine probably reaps 30% to 40% of its revenue from big companies.

Google's strategy is to start with remnant inventory and enlist small marketers to make it popular, just as it did with the online paid search model, analysts said. "To begin with, they will bring in 400 or 500 advertisers and when they get good, they will reach big advertisers," Mr. Rashtchy said.

Right now, the Ford Motor Cos. and Kraft Foods of the world would only look to Google's offline services if it could offer better targeting or more efficiency than what they could get from agencies. "If Google could represent hundreds of magazines, then they would have the mass to offer efficiency to big advertisers," Mr. Rashtchy said.

But that's coming, and sooner than one might think: Ms. VananBoskirk reckons two years.

"We don't want to displace the agency in the eyes of the traditional marketer," said Mr. Keane. But he can't resist adding that when all channels are operational through a Google auction system or even through the cost-per-thousand model Google also offers for paid search, "marketers would be able to manage [their entire campaign] in one place-they can look at search, content, Web, and print can be another piece of that."

Mediaedge's Mr. Janson said that unlike Google, his agency is more than "just a broker of space," noting that "marketers still come to an agency for expertise in targeting, analysis, optimal positioning." But others said the threat to media agencies is real. "Most agencies don't have experience in bid-able marketplaces," said Ellen Siminoff, CEO of search agency Efficient Frontier. "So if an agency doesn't want to get disintermediated out of the picture, they had better get expertise."

No treat yet

Media buyers' top five reasons not to fear Google offline:

  1. Google can never replace agencies' expertise
  2. Google is "just a broker"
  3. Google doesn’t have enough advertisers enrolled in offline to make a serious offline play.
  4. Only small companies are using Google's offline offerings now
  5. Google Print and dMarc are still in beta anyway

Share and share alike

Top search engines ranked by search share


    Google           48%
    Yahoo Search     22%
    MSN Search       11%
    AOL Search        6%
    My Way Search     3%

Source: Nielsen/NetRatings, January 2006

GRAPH: Search parties

PHOTO (COLOR): STILL A NEWBIE: a google print ad

~~~~~~~~

By Kris Oser

Google expected to hit $10 billion mark next year

Google's revenue is expected to climb to $10 billion worldwide by 2007, a new report by online market-research firm eMarketer predicted.

The reason for the growth is a combination of more searchers and the fact that the Google brand draws more searches, said David Hallerman, senior analyst and the report's author. Indeed, there are expected to be 144 million U.S. search-engine users this year, rising to 166.2 million by 2010. And, in terms of total paid-search ad spending, Google's share is expected to reach 57.2% in 2006, up from 32.9% in 2004.

"The largest reason for Google's growth is because of the Google brand," Mr. Hallerman said. "For the average user, Google is the equivalent of search."

Google has been wise in diversifying its business into content offerings, like Google Finance, which it introduced last week, the analyst said. "If Google can figure out how to do that in TV, with either video on demand or digital video recorders, and they can extend the technology of delivering relevant results, there would be even more of a gold mine," Mr. Hallerman added.

Beyond 2007, Google will contend with pressures-like click fraud and privacy-that "will potentially chip away at, if not halt, the growth of search engine marketing," the report said.

INFLUENCE

Brands with greatest impact on people's lives--2005


    1.  Apple
    2.  Google
    3.  Starbucks
    4.  Target
    5.  Lance Armstrong

Note: Impact is either positive or negative. Source: Brandchannel, January 2006.



Some items on this website are used by permission granted
in the Fair Use guidelines of the 1976 U.S. Copyright Act.
info [at] singlearticles.com
Powered by CommonSense

Turning the Car Keys Over to the Car.
Reports on the U.S. Dept. of Defense's $2 million Grand Challenge race over the Mojave Desert by dri...

Save More Money.
This article presents strategies for saving more money. The strategy includes maxing out one's 401...

Your Child's Health.
The article reviews the book "Your Child's Health," by Barton D. Schmitt.Full Text Word Count:205Dat...