Single Articles - the ultimate article blog

Titles Titles & descriptions

  

ONLINE.

Navigation: Main page

Author: Foster, Andrea L.

ONLINE


Who would choose to click repeatedly on a big red circle on a Web site, only to be told again and again that he or she is a loser?

About 1,000 people a day.

That result surprises even the three Stanford University graduate students who started a site called the Winbutton. For a while, visitors to the site who clicked on the red circle â€" which contains the word "win" â€" stood a slim chance of ' winning money. But the jackpot was usually no more than 10 bucks.

More often than not, clickers were fed a variety of quotes telling them how pathetic they were. Some examples: "At least you still have your looks." "Dude. What can I say. You just suck." "Winning isn't everything … but you are still a loser." "You lose. You must be a Stanford undergrad. Loser."

"To be perfectly honest, I don't know why people click on our site," said Alain T. Laederach, a postdoctoral student in bioinformatics who helps run the site. "I think they're sort of amused by it, by the funny quotes that you get when you lose."

Mr. Laederach's personal favorite: "Dear Loser, welcome to dumpsville. Population: you."

He and his buddies, Bernie J. Daigle and Brian T. Naughton, who also do research in bioinformatics, started the site about seven weeks ago, mostly for fun but also hoping to make money if enough people clicked on the advertisements that popped up each time users pressed the "win" button.

The Web site generated revenue using Google's AdSense program. Winbutton got money from businesses when visitors clicked on their ads. The subjects of the ads were related to words in the "loser" quotes.

Google got wind of the site, however, and last week pulled the advertisements, saying Winbutton violates company policy, which bars Web sites that involve gambling from using AdSense.

Winbutton is still operating, but the jackpot is now empty.

"It was fun while it lasted," says a note on the site. "Our hat goes off to the guys at Google who figured us out pretty quickly."

It seemed that most Winbutton fans weren't interested in the ads anyway, says Mr. Laederach.

The site took in $150 in advertising revenue but paid out the same amount, divided among 15 winners.

"It doesn't seem like our model was perfect," Mr. Laederach acknowledged.

He was not even sure that the site complied with federal law. Christine Hurt, an assistant professor of law at Marquette University, argued on the Conglomerate Blog this month that the students' site may have been an illegal gambling business.

The three students last month opened a related Web site, the Losebutton. Visitors there view a different quote about winners each time they click on a "lose" circle. That site's jackpot, too, is $0.

~~~~~~~~

By Andrea L. Foster



Some items on this website are used by permission granted
in the Fair Use guidelines of the 1976 U.S. Copyright Act.
info [at] singlearticles.com
Powered by CommonSense

Got a New Car? You Sure?
Suggests that car shoppers buy a newer model, and not a discounted 2005 model, which is already a ye...

GOOGLE.
Looks at Google's nontraditional approach to its overall business plan. How it allows Dennis Hwang t...

Money matics.
This article presents a comparison of the benefits and cost of a hybrid automobile to a diesel-power...